Darwin Cost of Living vs Salary
Urban Stress Index: 39.54
Is Darwin an affordable place to live? A typical resident spends around 27.1% of income on rent and 12.4% on food. That leaves approximately 60.5% of income available for savings and daily expenses.
The Urban Stress Index (USI) provides a structured way to evaluate cost-of-living pressure in Darwin. By combining housing and essential food costs, it highlights how much income is required to maintain a basic standard of living relative to local wages.
Cost Breakdown
| Item | Monthly | % of Income |
|---|---|---|
| Income | 8,350 | — |
| Rent (1BR) | 2,262 | 27.1% |
| Essential Food | 1,040 | 12.4% |
| Remaining | 5,048 | 60.5% |
Estimate Your Own Cost of Living
Use our cost of living calculator to estimate your own disposable income in Darwin.
Cost Structure Analysis
Darwin records an Urban Stress Index of approximately 39.5, placing it in the “Stretched” category and making it one of the more pressured cities in Australia outside Sydney. Housing absorbs about 27.1% of a typical monthly income, while essential food costs account for roughly 12.4%, by far one of the highest food shares among Australian cities in your dataset. This composition is important. Darwin is not primarily a housing-crisis city in the Sydney or Toronto sense. Instead, its burden comes from a combination of moderate rent, lower relative income support than Perth or Canberra, and unusually heavy food cost pressure.
The city’s economic structure helps explain why this pattern emerges. Darwin and the broader Northern Territory economy are strongly tied to energy, logistics, defence, tourism, and maritime activity, with strategic infrastructure and supply-chain functions linked to northern Australia and nearby Asian markets. These sectors give the city a distinct economic identity, but they do not translate into a broad, high-income wage base in the same way that finance does in Sydney or public administration does in Canberra. That makes cost shocks harder for the median earner to absorb.
Within Australia, Darwin stands apart from both Perth and Brisbane. Compared with Perth, Darwin has a much higher food burden and a weaker income cushion, which explains why the two cities can have not wildly different rent shares yet very different total USI outcomes. Compared with Brisbane, Darwin is similar in overall stress, but the composition is different: Brisbane is more clearly housing-led, while Darwin is more visibly shaped by the extra cost of everyday living in a smaller and more remote market.
A comparison with New Zealand cities is also useful. Darwin’s USI is close to Wellington’s, though again the structure differs. Wellington’s pressure is more closely tied to housing and income mismatch, while Darwin’s elevated food share plays a larger role. Overall, Darwin represents a smaller, strategically important city where structural affordability is constrained less by a single extreme housing premium and more by the combined effect of moderate rent, geographic remoteness, and higher recurring living costs.
Methodology
The Urban Stress Index (USI) measures how much of a typical income is spent on housing and essential food.
USI = Housing burden + Food cost share.
See full methodology here.
Sources
Housing data for Australian cities are based on the Domain Rental Report (September 2025). Median advertised rents for units/apartments are used as the housing proxy. Because these figures include a mix of studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom dwellings, a 0.9 adjustment is applied to approximate the cost of a typical one-bedroom unit for a single-person household.
Income data are based on Average Weekly Earnings, Australia, May 2025 published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Median weekly ordinary time earnings are converted into monthly gross salary estimates.
Food cost estimates are derived from a standardized meal-price proxy designed to approximate essential living costs for a single person. The measure is based on local restaurant price benchmarks and is converted into a monthly food cost estimate using a consistent methodology across cities.
For full explanation of assumptions, please see the Methodology and Sources pages.
See Related Cities & Comparisons
Other cities in Australia:
- Compare with Brisbane (USI: 37.6)
- Compare with Sydney (USI: 41.7)
- Compare with Melbourne (USI: 34.1)
- Compare with Hobart (USI: 33.5)
Cities with similar affordability outside Australia:
- Compare with Atlanta, USA (USI: 39.7)
- Compare with The Hague, Netherlands (USI: 39.4)
- Compare with Wellington, New Zealand (USI: 39.3)
- Compare with Manchester, United Kingdom (USI: 40.1)
🔍 Browse all other comparisons for Darwin (169 cities)
Australia
Canada
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
France
Germany
Hungary
Iceland
Japan
- Darwin vs Chiba
- Darwin vs Fukuoka
- Darwin vs Hamamatsu
- Darwin vs Hiroshima
- Darwin vs Kawasaki
- Darwin vs Kitakyushu
- Darwin vs Kobe
- Darwin vs Kumamoto
- Darwin vs Kyoto
- Darwin vs Nagoya
- Darwin vs Niigata
- Darwin vs Okayama
- Darwin vs Osaka
- Darwin vs Sagamihara
- Darwin vs Saitama
- Darwin vs Sakai
- Darwin vs Sapporo
- Darwin vs Sendai
- Darwin vs Shizuoka
- Darwin vs Tokyo
- Darwin vs Yokohama
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Norway
Slovakia
USA
- Darwin vs Atlanta
- Darwin vs Austin
- Darwin vs Baltimore
- Darwin vs Boise
- Darwin vs Boston
- Darwin vs Boulder
- Darwin vs Charlotte
- Darwin vs Chicago
- Darwin vs Cleveland
- Darwin vs Columbus
- Darwin vs Dallas
- Darwin vs Denver
- Darwin vs Detroit
- Darwin vs El Paso
- Darwin vs Hololulu
- Darwin vs Houston
- Darwin vs Indianapolis
- Darwin vs Jacksonville
- Darwin vs Kansas City
- Darwin vs Las Vegas
- Darwin vs Los Angeles
- Darwin vs Madison
- Darwin vs Memphis
- Darwin vs Miami
- Darwin vs Milwaukee
- Darwin vs Minneapolis
- Darwin vs Nashville
- Darwin vs New York City
- Darwin vs Oklahoma City
- Darwin vs Orlando
- Darwin vs Philadelphia
- Darwin vs Phoenix
- Darwin vs Pittsburgh
- Darwin vs Portland
- Darwin vs Raleigh
- Darwin vs Salt Lake City
- Darwin vs San Antonio
- Darwin vs San Diego
- Darwin vs San Francisco
- Darwin vs San Jose
- Darwin vs Seattle
- Darwin vs Tampa
- Darwin vs Washington DC