Osaka Cost of Living vs Salary
Urban Stress Index: 24.29
Is Osaka an affordable place to live? A typical resident spends around 17.0% of income on rent and 7.3% on food. That leaves approximately 75.7% of income available for savings and daily expenses.
The Urban Stress Index (USI) provides a structured way to evaluate cost-of-living pressure in Osaka. By combining housing and essential food costs, it highlights how much income is required to maintain a basic standard of living relative to local wages.
Cost Breakdown
| Item | Monthly | % of Income |
|---|---|---|
| Income | 376,900 | — |
| Rent (1BR) | 64,000 | 17.0% |
| Essential Food | 27,560 | 7.3% |
| Remaining | 285,340 | 75.7% |
Estimate Your Own Cost of Living
Use our cost of living calculator to estimate your own disposable income in Osaka.
Cost Structure Analysis
Osaka records an Urban Stress Index (USI) of 24.29, placing it within the low-pressure range while representing one of the most economically balanced large cities in Japan. Housing absorbs approximately 17.0% of income, while essential food costs account for just over 7%. This distribution reflects a stable cost structure in which both housing and food remain proportionate to local earnings. Compared with many global cities, Osaka maintains relatively low overall pressure despite its size and economic importance.
As Japan’s second-largest economic center, Osaka benefits from a diversified economy spanning commerce, finance, logistics, and manufacturing. This broad economic base supports relatively strong wage levels within the Japanese context, helping to offset housing costs more effectively than in smaller cities. Unlike regional cities where affordability is driven primarily by low costs, Osaka represents a model where income plays a more active role in sustaining affordability. This creates a form of income-supported equilibrium within Japan’s generally low-cost system.
Within Japan, Osaka occupies a middle ground between highly efficient industrial cities such as Nagoya and more distorted urban environments like Kyoto or the Tokyo commuter belt. Its USI is slightly higher than Nagoya’s due to stronger housing demand, but remains lower than cities such as Kobe, where spillover effects from nearby economic centers increase housing pressure without equivalent income gains. This positions Osaka as a relatively stable benchmark among large metropolitan areas outside Tokyo.
Internationally, Osaka’s affordability stands out. Its cost burden is significantly lower than that of Canadian cities, where housing and food together often exceed half of monthly income. Compared with Australian cities such as Sydney or Brisbane, Osaka achieves similar or lower overall pressure despite lower nominal wages, reflecting a more controlled cost structure. This highlights how a diversified economic base combined with moderate housing costs can sustain affordability without relying on high income levels.
Methodology
The Urban Stress Index (USI) measures how much of a typical income is spent on housing and essential food.
USI = Housing burden + Food cost share.
See full methodology here.
Sources
Housing data for Japanese cities are based on listings from SUUMO. For each city, housing cost is proxied using the average rent for a 1DK apartment in the administrative ward where the city’s main central station is located. For example, Yokohama uses the average 1DK rent in Nishi Ward, as Yokohama Station is located there. This approach is intended to reflect the rent level most relevant to the city’s main urban core.
Food cost estimates are based on a standardized inexpensive meal benchmark using charcoal-grilled mackerel set meal (さばの炭火焼き) from Ootoya. This benchmark is used instead of Numbeo restaurant prices in order to better reflect everyday dining habits in Japan and provide a more consistent proxy for affordable local meal costs across cities.
Salary data are based on the Japanese government’s 令和6年賃金構造基本統計調査, using きまって支給する現金給与額 (scheduled cash earnings), 男女計 (combined male and female values), as the salary benchmark for each prefecture or relevant labour market area.
For full explanation of assumptions, please see the Methodology and Sources pages.
See Related Cities & Comparisons
Other cities in Japan:
- Compare with Niigata (USI: 24.1)
- Compare with Fukuoka (USI: 24.1)
- Compare with Hiroshima (USI: 24.0)
- Compare with Kyoto (USI: 24.7)
Cities with similar affordability outside Japan:
- Compare with Leipzig, Germany (USI: 24.6)
- Compare with Cleveland, USA (USI: 24.7)
- Compare with Dresden, Germany (USI: 24.9)
- Compare with Graz, Austria (USI: 23.6)
🔍 Browse all other comparisons for Osaka (169 cities)
Australia
Canada
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
France
Germany
Hungary
Iceland
Japan
- Osaka vs Chiba
- Osaka vs Fukuoka
- Osaka vs Hamamatsu
- Osaka vs Hiroshima
- Osaka vs Kawasaki
- Osaka vs Kitakyushu
- Osaka vs Kobe
- Osaka vs Kumamoto
- Osaka vs Kyoto
- Osaka vs Nagoya
- Osaka vs Niigata
- Osaka vs Okayama
- Osaka vs Sagamihara
- Osaka vs Saitama
- Osaka vs Sakai
- Osaka vs Sapporo
- Osaka vs Sendai
- Osaka vs Shizuoka
- Osaka vs Tokyo
- Osaka vs Yokohama
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Norway
Portugal
Slovakia
USA
- Osaka vs Atlanta
- Osaka vs Austin
- Osaka vs Baltimore
- Osaka vs Boise
- Osaka vs Boston
- Osaka vs Boulder
- Osaka vs Charlotte
- Osaka vs Chicago
- Osaka vs Cleveland
- Osaka vs Columbus
- Osaka vs Dallas
- Osaka vs Denver
- Osaka vs Detroit
- Osaka vs El Paso
- Osaka vs Hololulu
- Osaka vs Houston
- Osaka vs Indianapolis
- Osaka vs Jacksonville
- Osaka vs Kansas City
- Osaka vs Las Vegas
- Osaka vs Los Angeles
- Osaka vs Madison
- Osaka vs Memphis
- Osaka vs Miami
- Osaka vs Milwaukee
- Osaka vs Minneapolis
- Osaka vs Nashville
- Osaka vs New York City
- Osaka vs Oklahoma City
- Osaka vs Orlando
- Osaka vs Philadelphia
- Osaka vs Phoenix
- Osaka vs Pittsburgh
- Osaka vs Portland
- Osaka vs Raleigh
- Osaka vs Salt Lake City
- Osaka vs San Antonio
- Osaka vs San Diego
- Osaka vs San Francisco
- Osaka vs San Jose
- Osaka vs Seattle
- Osaka vs Tampa
- Osaka vs Washington DC